An Aging Population? One of the most dramatic demographic trends in the world today is the aging of the population: an increase in the proportion of senior citizens relative to the youth and working age population. The reasons for this trend, "the greying of society", are often complex. They include, or will include in the next decade or so, the tremendous impact of the "baby boomer" generation, increases in life expectancy, changes in fertility patterns and for many geographical locations, out-migration of the younger members of society.
The demographic and economic forces associated with population aging will challenge health and social services leaders and policy-makers in the coming decades. In terms of health, some of the implications of an aging population include:
In a recent note in the newsletter of the Canadian Medical Association, a rural physician states that "the people we serve tend to be older, poorer and have more serious medical problems" (Vann, 2000). The focus of this section of the Rural Health issue is to examine the first part of Vann's statement. Is the rural population of Canada older? Is the demographic aging process faster in rural areas compared with urban areas? Some of these questions can be addressed by examining what is known as the "old-age dependency ratio".
Age dependency ratios tell us how many young people (under 15 years of age) or older people (over 64 years of age) depend on people of working age (15 to 64 years). Various formulations of these ratios are available but the old-age dependency ratio used in this discussion is constructed using the following equation:
Old-Age Dependency Ratio = (P65+ / P15-64) * 100
where:
P65+ = population aged 65 years or more
P15-64 = population aged 15 to 64 years
In other words an old-age dependency ratio of 17.5 indicates that there are 17.5 people 65 years or older for every 100 people 15 to 64 years old. Old-age dependency ratios have been computed for CDs, provinces/territories and Canada for the years 1991 through to 2000.
Old-Age Dependency Ratios, 1991
In 1991, 11.5% of the Canadian population was 65 years of age or older. The provincial and territorial variations in this percentage are shown in Figure 1. Nunavut had the lowest proportion (1.9%) while Saskatchewan had the highest proportion (14.1%) of seniors.
[D]
Click for larger version, 13 KB
Figure 1. General Age Structure, 1991
These proportions are echoed using old-age dependency ratios (Table 1).
| Province/Territory | % 65+ years of age | Old-age dependency ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 9.6 | 14.1 |
| Prince Edward Island | 13.1 | 20.4 |
| Nova Scotia | 12.5 | 18.6 |
| New Brunswick | 12.0 | 17.8 |
| Quebec | 11.1 | 16.0 |
| Ontario | 11.6 | 16.9 |
| Manitoba | 13.3 | 20.5 |
| Saskatchewan | 14.1 | 22.7 |
| Alberta | 9.0 | 13.3 |
| British Columbia | 12.7 | 18.9 |
| Yukon Territory | 3.9 | 5.4 |
| Northwest Territories | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| Nunavut | 1.9 | 3.3 |
| CANADA | 11.5 | 16.9 |
In 2000, 12.5% of the Canadian population was 65 years of age or older. The provincial and territorial variations in this percentage are shown in Figure 2. As in 1991, Nunavut had the lowest proportion (2.6%) while Saskatchewan had the highest proportion (14.5%) of seniors.
[D]
Click for larger version, 13 KB
Figure 2. General Age Structure, 2000
These proportions are echoed using old-age dependency ratios (Table 2).
| Province/Territory | Percentage 65+ years of age |
Old-age dependency ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 11.6 | 16.4 |
| Prince Edward Island | 13.1 | 19.5 |
| Nova Scotia | 13.2 | 19.2 |
| New Brunswick | 12.9 | 18.7 |
| Quebec | 12.8 | 18.5 |
| Ontario | 12.6 | 18.5 |
| Manitoba | 13.5 | 20.6 |
| Saskatchewan | 14.5 | 22.6 |
| Alberta | 10.1 | 14.6 |
| British Columbia | 13.0 | 18.8 |
| Yukon Territory | 5.4 | 7.4 |
| Northwest Territories | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Nunavut | 2.6 | 4.4 |
| CANADA | 12.5 | 18.3 |
Figure 3 shows the steady climb in the old-age dependency ratio for the period from 1991 to 2000. Even during this relatively short period of time the old-age dependency ratio has risen from 16.9 to 18.3.
[D]
Click for larger version, 3 KB
Figure 3. Old-Age Dependency Ratio, Canada 1991-2000
However, the change in the old-age dependency ratio has not been uniform throughout all of the provinces and territories of Canada (Table 3). In this table, provincial/territorial old-age dependency ratios for the year 2000 have been divided by the respective ratios from 1991. A value of 1.0 would indicate no change; a value greater than 1.0 indicates that there has been an increase in the proportions of seniors dependent on the working age population; and a value less than 1.0 indicates that the proportion of dependent seniors has decreased.
| Province/Territory | 2000 old-age dependency ratiodivided by 1991 old-age dependency ratio |
|---|---|
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 1.16 |
| Prince Edward Island | 0.96 |
| Nova Scotia | 1.03 |
| New Brunswick | 1.05 |
| Quebec | 1.16 |
| Ontario | 1.09 |
| Manitoba | 1.00 |
| Saskatchewan | 0.99 |
| Alberta | 1.09 |
| British Columbia | 0.99 |
| Yukon Territory | 1.37 |
| Northwest Territories | 1.28 |
| Nunavut | 1.33 |
| CANADA | 1.08 |
These old-age dependency ratios provide an indication of the aging of the Canadian population and should be read in conjunction with the age and age structure maps and discussions found elsewhere in the Atlas.